Zigmond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Zigmond v. State

235 S.W. 212

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 30, 1921·No. No. 6499·Published

Opinion

LATTIMOEE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Atascosa county of using abusive language, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25.

[1, 2] The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The complaint and information appear to be in regular form, and there seems nothing wrong with the charge of the court. Appellant excepted to the court’s charge as being on the weight of the evidence, but in the absence of a statement of facts we cannot determine the merit of such exception.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMOEE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Atascosa county of using abusive language, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25.

[1, 2] The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The complaint and information appear to be in regular form, and there seems nothing wrong with the charge of the court. Appellant excepted to the court’s charge as being on the weight of the evidence, but in the absence of a statement of facts we cannot determine the merit of such exception.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Zigmond v. State, 235 S.W. 212 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

235 S.W. 212 (Zigmond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.