Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan

DecidedApril 28, 2014

Docket148550

StatusPublished

This text of Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan (Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan, (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

148550 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack ZIGMOND CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., David F. Viviano, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellant, v SC: 148550 COA: 304756 Wayne CC: 09-010906-CZ AAA MICHIGAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and NEUROSCIENCE, P.C., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2014 h0421 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

148550 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack ZIGMOND CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., David F. Viviano, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellant, v SC: 148550 COA: 304756 Wayne CC: 09-010906-CZ AAA MICHIGAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and NEUROSCIENCE, P.C., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2014 h0421 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Zigmond Chiropractic Pc v. Aaa Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zigmond-chiropractic-pc-v-aaa-michigan-mich-2014.