Ziglar v. . Sisk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ziglar v. . Sisk

126 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 407

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 31, 1925·Published

Opinion

*827 Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the alleged unlawful homicide of her intestate and recovered judgment. The defendant appealed chiefly assigning as error the exclusion of evidence tending to show the animus and ill-will of the deceased toward the defendant and the court’s instruction as to the quantum of proof required of the defendant. A careful examination of the record leads'us to the conclusion that the case has been tried in substantial compliance with previous decisions of this Court and that there is no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment.

We find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*827 Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the alleged unlawful homicide of her intestate and recovered judgment. The defendant appealed chiefly assigning as error the exclusion of evidence tending to show the animus and ill-will of the deceased toward the defendant and the court’s instruction as to the quantum of proof required of the defendant. A careful examination of the record leads'us to the conclusion that the case has been tried in substantial compliance with previous decisions of this Court and that there is no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment.

We find

No error.

Ziglar v. . Sisk, 126 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 407 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

126 S.E. 927 (Ziglar v. . Sisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.