Ziglar v. . Sisk

126 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 407
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 31, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 927 (Ziglar v. . Sisk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ziglar v. . Sisk, 126 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 407 (N.C. 1925).

Opinion

*827 Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the alleged unlawful homicide of her intestate and recovered judgment. The defendant appealed chiefly assigning as error the exclusion of evidence tending to show the animus and ill-will of the deceased toward the defendant and the court’s instruction as to the quantum of proof required of the defendant. A careful examination of the record leads'us to the conclusion that the case has been tried in substantial compliance with previous decisions of this Court and that there is no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment.

We find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziglar-v-sisk-nc-1925.