Ziesel v. Ziesel
125 A. 318, 94 N.J. Eq. 571, 9 Stock. 571, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ziesel v. Ziesel. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 N.J. Eq. 153 →
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — The ' Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ziesel v. Ziesel, 125 A. 318, 94 N.J. Eq. 571, 9 Stock. 571, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 711 (N.J. 1923).
125 A. 318 (Ziesel v. Ziesel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.