Zier v. Zier
838 So. 2d 684, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2618, 2003 WL 728982
Opinion
The trial court acted well within its discretion in ruling that the appellant former husband must reimburse the appellee former wife for attorney’s fees expended in compelling compliance with the final judgment and ruling that these fees will come from the former husband’s share of the proceeds of the sale of the parties’ home. See Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697, 700 (Fla.1997); Meloan v. Coverdale, 525 So.2d 935, 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zier v. Zier, 838 So. 2d 684, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2618, 2003 WL 728982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
838 So. 2d 684 (Zier v. Zier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosen v. Rosen
696 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Meloan v. Coverdale
525 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)