Zier v. Zier

838 So. 2d 684, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2618, 2003 WL 728982
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2003
DocketNo. 3D01-3364
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 684 (Zier v. Zier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zier v. Zier, 838 So. 2d 684, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2618, 2003 WL 728982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court acted well within its discretion in ruling that the appellant former husband must reimburse the appellee former wife for attorney’s fees expended in compelling compliance with the final judgment and ruling that these fees will come from the former husband’s share of the proceeds of the sale of the parties’ home. See Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697, 700 (Fla.1997); Meloan v. Coverdale, 525 So.2d 935, 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosen v. Rosen
696 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Meloan v. Coverdale
525 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 684, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2618, 2003 WL 728982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zier-v-zier-fladistctapp-2003.