Ziemer v. Hohl

464 N.W.2d 333, 236 Neb. 886, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 40
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1991·No. No. 89-071·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having considered the briefs, record, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s request for attorney fees, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-824 (Reissue 1989), for a frivolous appeal because of the failure of appellant’s attorney to appear, is denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ziemer v. Hohl, 464 N.W.2d 333, 236 Neb. 886, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 40 (Neb. 1991).

464 N.W.2d 333 (Ziemer v. Hohl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 25-824
Nebraska § 25-824