Ziemer v. Hohl
464 N.W.2d 333, 236 Neb. 886, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 40
This text of 464 N.W.2d 333 (Ziemer v. Hohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ziemer v. Hohl, 464 N.W.2d 333, 236 Neb. 886, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 40 (Neb. 1991).
Opinion
Having considered the briefs, record, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s request for attorney fees, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-824 (Reissue 1989), for a frivolous appeal because of the failure of appellant’s attorney to appear, is denied.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 25-824
Nebraska § 25-824
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
464 N.W.2d 333, 236 Neb. 886, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziemer-v-hohl-neb-1991.