Ziemba v. Commissioner of Correction

875 A.2d 597, 90 Conn. App. 70, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 289

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Duane Ziemba, fails to set forth in his brief any analysis of his claim that the court abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

“We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . . Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly. . . . The petitioner has provided us with nothing more than conclusory assertions.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586, 706 A.2d 989, cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).

The appeal is dismissed.