Ziemba v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Ziemba v. Commissioner of Correction

875 A.2d 597, 90 Conn. App. 70, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 289

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJuly 5, 2005

DocketAC 24402

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 875 A.2d 597 (Ziemba v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ziemba v. Commissioner of Correction, 875 A.2d 597, 90 Conn. App. 70, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 289 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Duane Ziemba, fails to set forth in his brief any analysis of his claim that the court abused its discretion by denying his petition for *71 certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

“We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . . Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly. . . . The petitioner has provided us with nothing more than conclusory assertions.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586, 706 A.2d 989, cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Duane Ziemba, fails to set forth in his brief any analysis of his claim that the court abused its discretion by denying his petition for *71 certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

“We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . . Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly. . . . The petitioner has provided us with nothing more than conclusory assertions.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586, 706 A.2d 989, cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

875 A.2d 597, 90 Conn. App. 70, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziemba-v-commissioner-of-correction-connappct-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack