Ziegler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ziegler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

79 A.D.2d 706, 437 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14101

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 706 (Ziegler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ziegler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 79 A.D.2d 706, 437 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Ford Motor Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated March 26, 1980, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike certain of its interrogatories. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision striking paragraph 13 of the interrogatories. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to the plaintiff (see Wasmuth v Hinds-Toomy Auto Corp., 39 AD2d 723). The time within which the plaintiff is to answer said interrogatory is extended until 30 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon together with notice of entry thereof. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Ford Motor Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated March 26, 1980, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike certain of its interrogatories. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision striking paragraph 13 of the interrogatories. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to the plaintiff (see Wasmuth v Hinds-Toomy Auto Corp., 39 AD2d 723). The time within which the plaintiff is to answer said interrogatory is extended until 30 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon together with notice of entry thereof. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 706, 437 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziegler-v-firestone-tire-rubber-co-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack