Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill

177 A.D. 881

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified so as to restrain the use of the word “Follies” of any particular year, unless the entertainment so designated by the defendant is emphasized by the addition of his name in type and style which will be equally conspicuous with [882]*882the name of the “Follies,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified so as to restrain the use of the word “Follies” of any particular year, unless the entertainment so designated by the defendant is emphasized by the addition of his name in type and style which will be equally conspicuous with [882]*882the name of the “Follies,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill, 177 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

177 A.D. 881 (Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related