Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill

177 A.D. 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 177 A.D. 881 (Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ziegfeld Follies, Inc. v. Hill, 177 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified so as to restrain the use of the word “Follies” of any particular year, unless the entertainment so designated by the defendant is emphasized by the addition of his name in type and style which will be equally conspicuous with [882]*882the name of the “Follies,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified so as to restrain the use of the word “Follies” of any particular year, unless the entertainment so designated by the defendant is emphasized by the addition of his name in type and style which will be equally conspicuous with [882]*882the name of the “Follies,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziegfeld-follies-inc-v-hill-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack