Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

Second Circuit

Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

300 F. App'x 108

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 21, 2008·No. No. 07-3948-cv.·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Pursuant to this Court’s order of June 28, 2007 in the prior appeal, see Ziegenfuss Drilling v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Dkt. No. 06-3533-cv, and following proceedings in the district court, jurisdiction over this case has been restored to this Court. The parties’ familiarity with the facts and prior proceedings is assumed.

Having reviewed Judge Stanton’s supplemental findings after this Court’s remand, we conclude that those findings are not clearly erroneous. See Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P., 344 F.3d 184,199 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam).

The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Pursuant to this Court’s order of June 28, 2007 in the prior appeal, see Ziegenfuss Drilling v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Dkt. No. 06-3533-cv, and following proceedings in the district court, jurisdiction over this case has been restored to this Court. The parties’ familiarity with the facts and prior proceedings is assumed.

Having reviewed Judge Stanton’s supplemental findings after this Court’s remand, we conclude that those findings are not clearly erroneous. See Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P., 344 F.3d 184,199 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam).

The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance, 300 F. App'x 108 (2d Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 108 (Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related