Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

300 F. App'x 108
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 2008
DocketNo. 07-3948-cv.
StatusPublished

This text of 300 F. App'x 108 (Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance, 300 F. App'x 108 (2d Cir. 2008).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Pursuant to this Court’s order of June 28, 2007 in the prior appeal, see Ziegenfuss Drilling v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Dkt. No. 06-3533-cv, and following proceedings in the district court, jurisdiction over this case has been restored to this Court. The parties’ familiarity with the facts and prior proceedings is assumed.

Having reviewed Judge Stanton’s supplemental findings after this Court’s remand, we conclude that those findings are not clearly erroneous. See Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P., 344 F.3d 184,199 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam).

The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P.
344 F.3d 184 (Second Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziegenfuss-drilling-inc-v-national-union-fire-insurance-ca2-2008.