Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania

134 S. Ct. 621, 187 L. Ed. 2d 398, 571 U.S. 1007, 82 U.S.L.W. 3279, 2013 WL 4811864, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8123
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 12, 2013
DocketNo. 13–6226.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S. Ct. 621 (Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 621, 187 L. Ed. 2d 398, 571 U.S. 1007, 82 U.S.L.W. 3279, 2013 WL 4811864, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8123 (U.S. 2013).

Opinion

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell unless the docketing *622fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 621, 187 L. Ed. 2d 398, 571 U.S. 1007, 82 U.S.L.W. 3279, 2013 WL 4811864, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zied-campbell-v-pennsylvania-scotus-2013.