Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court

Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania

134 S. Ct. 621, 187 L. Ed. 2d 398, 571 U.S. 1007, 82 U.S.L.W. 3279, 2013 WL 4811864, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8123

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 12, 2013·No. No. 13–6226.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell unless the docketing *622fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell unless the docketing *622fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 621, 187 L. Ed. 2d 398, 571 U.S. 1007, 82 U.S.L.W. 3279, 2013 WL 4811864, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8123 (U.S. 2013).

Pincite

134 S. Ct. 621 (Zied-Campbell v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related