Zickefoose v. Bledsoe

145 S.W.2d 905
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 9, 1940
DocketNo. 5230.
StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.W.2d 905 (Zickefoose v. Bledsoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zickefoose v. Bledsoe, 145 S.W.2d 905 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

FOLLEY, Justice.

The appellant has failed to file a brief in this case and no excuse is offered -or good cause shown for such failure.

The appellees request that we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*906 Finding no fundamental error in the record the judgment is affirmed. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., Tex.Com.App., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.W.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zickefoose-v-bledsoe-texapp-1940.