Zick v. Smith
116 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 351, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 211
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in) the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICatzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zick v. Smith, 116 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 351, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 211 (N.J. 1922).
116 A. 927 (Zick v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tiberi v. Petrella
159 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)