Zick v. City of Maplewood

Eighth Circuit

Zick v. City of Maplewood

50 F. App'x 805

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 2002

DocketNos. 01-3855, 01-3857

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 F. App'x 805 (Zick v. City of Maplewood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zick v. City of Maplewood, 50 F. App'x 805 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Robert Zick and Kevin Berglund have separately appealed from the district court’s¹ grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, City of Maplewood; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; and John Banick, on all issues. The claims of both parties arise from the same set of facts. This court, on its own motion, consolidates the two cases for purposes of deciding the issues on appeal.

We have reviewed the record of the district court and find no error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Robert Zick and Kevin Berglund have separately appealed from the district court’s¹ grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, City of Maplewood; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; and John Banick, on all issues. The claims of both parties arise from the same set of facts. This court, on its own motion, consolidates the two cases for purposes of deciding the issues on appeal.

We have reviewed the record of the district court and find no error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 F. App'x 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zick-v-city-of-maplewood-ca8-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack