Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ziankoski v. Simmons

Ziankoski v. Simmons

140 A.D.2d 1007, 529 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 140 A.D.2d 1007 (Ziankoski v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ziankoski v. Simmons, 140 A.D.2d 1007, 529 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Memorandum: The motion for a preliminary injunction should not have been granted because the plaintiffs failed to show that, in the absence of an injunction, they would suffer irreparable injury (see, CPLR 6301). Moreover, Special Term had no power to dispense with the undertaking required by CPLR 6312 (b) (City Store Gates Mfg. Corp. v United Steel Prods., 79 AD2d 671, 672). Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
2018 NY Slip Op 2957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Malach v. Key International Manufacturing, Inc.
157 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v. Beck
155 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 1007, 529 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziankoski-v-simmons-nyappdiv-1988.