Zhenlu Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Zhenlu Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp.

398 F. App'x 899

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2010·No. No. 10-1579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(b) motion for reconsideration and a motion for sanctions after the imposition of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Zhang v. Science & Tech. Carp., No. 8:08-cv-01716-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(b) motion for reconsideration and a motion for sanctions after the imposition of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Zhang v. Science & Tech. Carp., No. 8:08-cv-01716-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Zhenlu Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp., 398 F. App'x 899 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

398 F. App'x 899 (Zhenlu Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.