Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co. v. United States

818 F. Supp. 2d 1355, 34 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1127, 2012 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 14

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 707 F. Supp. 2d 1355 →

United States Court of International Trade·Decided January 27, 2012·No. Slip Op. 12-13; Court No. 09-00217·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

DONALD C. POGUE, Chief Judge.

This matter returns to court following remand in accordance with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, 652 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2011), which vacated and remanded our previous judgment in Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, - CIT -, 707 F.Supp.2d 1355 (2010). Before the court now are the Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, Jan. 5, 2012, ECF No. 68 (“Remand Results”).

Both Plaintiff and Defendant Intervenor concur with the Remand Results and have requested expeditious resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the court affirms the Remand Results. See JTEKT Corp. v. United States, 780 F.Supp.2d 1357, 1367 (CIT 2011). Therefore, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Results are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

DONALD C. POGUE, Chief Judge.

This matter returns to court following remand in accordance with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, 652 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2011), which vacated and remanded our previous judgment in Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, - CIT -, 707 F.Supp.2d 1355 (2010). Before the court now are the Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, Jan. 5, 2012, ECF No. 68 (“Remand Results”).

Both Plaintiff and Defendant Intervenor concur with the Remand Results and have requested expeditious resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the court affirms the Remand Results. See JTEKT Corp. v. United States, 780 F.Supp.2d 1357, 1367 (CIT 2011). Therefore, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Results are affirmed.

Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1355, 34 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1127, 2012 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 14 (cit 2012).

Pincite

818 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related