Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008)

Oregon Tax Court

Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008)

DecidedSeptember 19, 2008

DocketTC-MD 080440D.

StatusPublished

This text of Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008) (Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008), (Or. Super. Ct. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed May 5, 2008, requesting that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on Wednesday, September 3, 2008. Yao Yuan (Yuan) appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Leanne Holz and Ken Collmer (Collmer), appraisers, appeared on behalf of Defendant.

Collmer stated, and Yuan confirmed, that Plaintiff believes the real market value of his property is no more than $740,000 as of the assessment date for tax year 2007-08. Collmer reviewed his prepared Calculations for Tax Year 2007, which was attached to his Motion to Dismiss. His calculations show that, if the court accepted Plaintiff's determination of real market value ($740,000), there would be no reduction in Plaintiff's property taxes. Collmer explained that, given Plaintiff's assessed value of $447,140, the proposed real market value does not change the property tax calculation.

The parties discussed the significance of real market value. It was suggested that Plaintiff review his property tax statement for the 2008-09 tax year and then decide whether he wants to appeal the real market value to the board of property tax appeals.

The court explained that, because there would be no change in the property tax paid for 2007-08 if the court granted Plaintiff's request to reduce the real market value of the subject *Page 2 property to $740,000, Plaintiff is not aggrieved and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed May 5, 2008, requesting that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on Wednesday, September 3, 2008. Yao Yuan (Yuan) appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Leanne Holz and Ken Collmer (Collmer), appraisers, appeared on behalf of Defendant.

Collmer stated, and Yuan confirmed, that Plaintiff believes the real market value of his property is no more than $740,000 as of the assessment date for tax year 2007-08. Collmer reviewed his prepared Calculations for Tax Year 2007, which was attached to his Motion to Dismiss. His calculations show that, if the court accepted Plaintiff's determination of real market value ($740,000), there would be no reduction in Plaintiff's property taxes. Collmer explained that, given Plaintiff's assessed value of $447,140, the proposed real market value does not change the property tax calculation.

The parties discussed the significance of real market value. It was suggested that Plaintiff review his property tax statement for the 2008-09 tax year and then decide whether he wants to appeal the real market value to the board of property tax appeals.

The court explained that, because there would be no change in the property tax paid for 2007-08 if the court granted Plaintiff's request to reduce the real market value of the subject *Page 2 property to $740,000, Plaintiff is not aggrieved and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Zhang v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080440d (or.tax. 9-19-2008), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zhang-v-multnomah-county-assessor-tc-md-080440d-ortax-9-19-2008-ortc-2008.