Zhang, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Barnes)

Nevada Supreme Court

Zhang, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Barnes)

DecidedJuly 1, 2014

Docket65957

StatusUnpublished

This text of Zhang, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Barnes) (Zhang, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Barnes)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zhang, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Barnes), (Neb. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the arguments set forth in the writ petition, we conclude that our intervention is unwarranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Valley Health, 127 Nev. at , 252 P.3d at 678-79; Hetter v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 110 Nev. 513, 520, 874 P.2d 762, 766 (1994) (recognizing that tax returns and financial records are relevant to the matter of punitive damages, not privileged, and discoverable so long as the plaintiff demonstrates "some factual basis" supporting punitive damages). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

Hardes

0107 10 % j Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, petitioners' emergency stay motion is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the arguments set forth in the writ petition, we conclude that our intervention is unwarranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Valley Health, 127 Nev. at , 252 P.3d at 678-79; Hetter v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 110 Nev. 513, 520, 874 P.2d 762, 766 (1994) (recognizing that tax returns and financial records are relevant to the matter of punitive damages, not privileged, and discoverable so long as the plaintiff demonstrates "some factual basis" supporting punitive damages). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'