Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.

285 A.D.2d 591, 728 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7604
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 29, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant Kmart Corporation s/h/a K-Mart Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

K-Mart met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted K-Mart’s motion for summary judgment. Santucci, J. P., Gold-stein, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zguris v. K-Mart Corp., 285 A.D.2d 591, 728 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

285 A.D.2d 591 (Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. County of Orange
292 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)