Zeus Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Zeus Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc.

11 F. App'x 206

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zeus Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.3d 238 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2001·No. 00-1748·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alphin Aircraft, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zeus Enters., Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc., No. CA-97-294 (E.D.Va. May 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Alphin Aircraft, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zeus Enters., Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc., No. CA-97-294 (E.D.Va. May 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Zeus Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc., 11 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 206 (Zeus Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.