Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AUTUMN ZETTZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. (ECF No. 222) On February 15, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 222.) In light of the stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). T IS SO ORDERED. FA. 53 Pated: _February 16, 2023 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation (Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.