Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AUTUMN ZETTZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 12 | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 222) 14 15 On February 15, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 222.) In light 16 | of the stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); 17 | Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without 18 | prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 21 T IS SO ORDERED. 22 FA. 53 Pated: _February 16, 2023 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28