Zerrano v. Wilson
62 Mass. 424
Opinion
The defence set up, that the account upon which the action is founded had been paid by the bill of exchange, cannot be maintained. The bill of exchange had not been accepted nor paid, but was protested for non-acceptance and non-payment, and was produced by the plaintiffs at the trial, and put on file with the papers, so that it was not outstanding, and would therefore furnish no defence to a recovery on the original account. Alcock v. Hopkins, 6 Cush. 484.
Judgment on the verdict-for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zerrano v. Wilson, 62 Mass. 424 (Mass. 1851).
62 Mass. 424 (Zerrano v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reserve Loan Life Insurance v. Dulin
122 N.E. 3 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)
Dille v. White
109 N.W. 909 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)