Zerner v. Supermarkets General Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zerner v. Supermarkets General Corp.

156 A.D.2d 320, 550 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 320 (Zerner v. Supermarkets General Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zerner v. Supermarkets General Corp., 156 A.D.2d 320, 550 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 8, 1989, which adopted the report of the Special Master and denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue from New York County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon examination of this record, we conclude that the IAS court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue (see, Wecht v Glen Distribs. Co., 112 AD2d 891, 892) and that defendant has failed to make proper and timely application for such relief as a matter of right. (See, CPLR 510 [1]; 511 [b].) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 8, 1989, which adopted the report of the Special Master and denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue from New York County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon examination of this record, we conclude that the IAS court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue (see, Wecht v Glen Distribs. Co., 112 AD2d 891, 892) and that defendant has failed to make proper and timely application for such relief as a matter of right. (See, CPLR 510 [1]; 511 [b].) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 320, 550 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zerner-v-supermarkets-general-corp-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack