Zerkowitz v. Bishop's Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zerkowitz v. Bishop's Service, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 767 (Zerkowitz v. Bishop's Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zerkowitz v. Bishop's Service, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by striking out of paragraph “ Fifth ” of the amended complaint the words: “ (meaning that the plaintiff had brought a ‘ nuisance suit ’ against his former employer because of his dismissal) * * * (meaning that he" exaggerated and lied to defendant, Bishop’s Service, Incorporated, with respect to the positions held by him and the responsibilities thereof) * * * (that he is inefficient and has not a good reputation with respect to ability in the field of brokerage, freight forwarding, export and import) ” and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and with leave to the plantiff to serve a further amended complaint within twenty days after service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by striking out of paragraph “ Fifth ” of the amended complaint the words: “ (meaning that the plaintiff had brought a ‘ nuisance suit ’ against his former employer because of his dismissal) * * * (meaning that he" exaggerated and lied to defendant, Bishop’s Service, Incorporated, with respect to the positions held by him and the responsibilities thereof) * * * (that he is inefficient and has not a good reputation with respect to ability in the field of brokerage, freight forwarding, export and import) ” and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and with leave to the plantiff to serve a further amended complaint within twenty days after service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zerkowitz-v-bishops-service-inc-nyappdiv-1950.