Zerino v. Coster
This text of 275 A.D.2d 1058 (Zerino v. Coster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is a basis in the record for the commission’s determination that the respondent Zerino failed to establish an immediate compelling necessity for the eviction of the tenant Hogan; hence it may not be said that the action of the commission was arbitrary or capricious, and the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the commission. (Matter of Vinti v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 956, and cases cited therein.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zerino-v-coster-nyappdiv-1949.