Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit

178 L. Ed. 2d 19, 131 S. Ct. 385, 562 U.S. 824, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6235, 79 U.S.L.W. 3195
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-5221·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [20] denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 621.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit, 178 L. Ed. 2d 19, 131 S. Ct. 385, 562 U.S. 824, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6235, 79 U.S.L.W. 3195 (U.S. 2010).

178 L. Ed. 2d 19 (Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit
353 F. App'x 621 (Second Circuit, 2009)