Zerbey v. Thomas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Zerbey v. Thomas

192 A. 237, 122 N.J. Eq. 328, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 585

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A. 237 (Zerbey v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zerbey v. Thomas, 192 A. 237, 122 N.J. Eq. 328, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 585 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cuexam.

The decree below was in favor of the defendant-respondent. It rests largely, if not wholly, upon findings of fact by the vice-chancellor. We have examined with care the record and are entirely satisfied that the decree was quite right, and it will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffekty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cuexam.

The decree below was in favor of the defendant-respondent. It rests largely, if not wholly, upon findings of fact by the vice-chancellor. We have examined with care the record and are entirely satisfied that the decree was quite right, and it will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffekty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 237, 122 N.J. Eq. 328, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zerbey-v-thomas-nj-1937.