Zerbey v. Thomas

192 A. 237, 122 N.J. Eq. 328, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 585

Opinion

Pee Cuexam.

The decree below was in favor of the defendant-respondent. It rests largely, if not wholly, upon findings of fact by the vice-chancellor. We have examined with care the record and are entirely satisfied that the decree was quite right, and it will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffekty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.