Zerbe

546 F.2d 431, 211 Ct. Cl. 358, 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 198
United States Court of Claims·Decided October 21, 1976·No. No. 47-76·Published

Opinion

Court of Claims jurisdiction; tort claim; revocable license or permit. — On October 21,1976 the court entered the following order.

[359] Before SkeltoN, Judge, Presiding, Nichols and Kashiwa, Judges.

“Defendant bas moved to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff complains of the cancellation of a permit to occupy land on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. It was, according to its terms, terminable and revocable at the discretion of the approving officer. If an action for termination of a license terminable at will lies at all, it sounds in tort and is not within our subject matter jurisdiction. Isthmian Airways, Inc. v. United States, 94 Ct. Cl. 598 (1941).

“Accordingly, on the petition, the motion, and the briefs, but without oral argument, it is concluded that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the case, and the petition is therefore dismissed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zerbe, 546 F.2d 431, 211 Ct. Cl. 358, 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 198 (cc 1976).

546 F.2d 431 (Zerbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isthmian Airways, Inc. v. United States
94 Ct. Cl. 598 (Court of Claims, 1941)