Zepke v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Zepke v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

64 P.2d 1002, 18 Cal. App. 2d 754, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 585

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 28, 1937

DocketCiv. No. 5816

StatusPublished

This text of 64 P.2d 1002 (Zepke v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zepke v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance, 64 P.2d 1002, 18 Cal. App. 2d 754, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 585 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This cause is before us upon a motion to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the notice of appeal was not filed within the statutory time provided by section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The record before us shows that a motion for new trial was denied by operation on the 16th day of November, 1936; that the notice of appeal was not filed in the above-entitled cause until the 19th day of December, 1936, three days too late to give this court jurisdiction.

The appellant relies upon section 953-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. We find nothing in that section, however, which, relieves the appellant from default herein.

Under the decision in the case of Kocher v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 137 Cal. App. 476 [30 Pac. (2d) 535], and the cases therein cited, it follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI