Zephyr Insurance Company, Inc. v. Sakamoto
This text of Zephyr Insurance Company, Inc. v. Sakamoto (Zephyr Insurance Company, Inc. v. Sakamoto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000551 22-JUN-2012 11:37 AM
NO. SCPW-12-0000551
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
ZEPHYR INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE KARL K. SAKAMOTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I;
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER; and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I,
INSURANCE DIVISION, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIVIL No. 10-1-2078-09)
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.
and Circuit Judge Ahn, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of petitioner Zephyr Insurance Company,
Inc.'s petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it
appears that HRS § 235-114(a) (Supp. 2011) authorizes an appeal to
the tax appeal court from any assessment of income tax or
liability imposed by HRS Chapter 235. HRS § 235-114(c) (Supp.
2011) requires the notice of appeal to be filed in the tax appeal
court "within thirty days subsequent to the date when the notice
of assessment was mailed." The DCCA insurance division's
November 15, 2010 letter on petitioner's tax credit claim -- if
appealable by petitioner pursuant to HRS § 235-114(a), as the
respondent judge determined -- was appealable by notice of appeal
filed within thirty days after the letter was mailed. The
November 15, 2010 letter was presumably mailed when it was
written, the time for filing an appeal under HRS § 235-114
expired in 2010, and an appeal to the tax appeal court is now
precluded. The respondent judge's rulings to the contrary were
incorrect. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the answer provision of HRAP
21(c) is suspended pursuant to HRAP 2.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is granted. The respondent judge shall set aside the
stay of Civil No. 10-1-2078-09 and shall proceed to hear and
dispose of petitioner's agency appeal.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 22, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Karen S.S. Ahn
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zephyr Insurance Company, Inc. v. Sakamoto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zephyr-insurance-company-inc-v-sakamoto-haw-2012.