Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings

District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 7, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-02731·Unknown

Opinion

WILLIAM S. FREEMAN (SBN 82002) MANOHAR RAJU (SBN 193771) wfreeman@aclunc.org Public Defender SEAN RIORDAN (SBN 255752) MATT GONZALEZ (SBN 153486) sriordan@aclunc.org Chief Attorney ANGÉLICA SALCEDA (SBN 296152) GENNA ELLIS BEIER (CA SBN 300505) asalceda@aclunc.org genna.beier@sfgov.org AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION EMILOU H. MACLEAN (CA SBN 319071) FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN emilou.maclean@sfgov.org CALIFORNIA FRANCISCO UGARTE (CA SBN 241710) 39 Drumm Street francisco.ugarte@sfgov.org San Francisco, CA 94111 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Telephone: (415) 621-2493 SAN FRANCISCO Facsimile: (415) 255-8437 555 Seventh Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Attorneys for Petitioners-Plaintiffs Direct: 415-553-9319 Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page Fax: 415-553-9810

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CASE NO. 3:20-CV-02731-VC BRENDA RUIZ TOVAR, LAWRENCE MWAURA, LUCIANO GONZALO JOINT [PROPOSED] SEALING MENDOZA JERONIMO, CORAIMA ORDER RE ALL BAIL YARITZA SANCHEZ NUÑEZ, JAVIER APPLICATIONS ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Director of the San Francisco Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; GEO GROUP, INC.; NATHAN ALLEN, Warden of Mesa Verde Detention Facility,

Respondents-Defendants.

BREE BERNWANGER* (NY SBN 5036397) MARTIN S. SCHENKER (SBN 109828) bbernwanger@lccrsf.org mschenker@cooley.com TIFANEI RESSL-MOYER (SBN 319721) COOLEY LLP tresslmoyer@lccrsf.org 101 California Street, 5th Floor HAYDEN RODARTE (SBN 329432) San Francisco, CA 94111 hrodarte@lccrsf.org Telephone: (415) 693-2000 LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 CIVIL RIGHTS OF SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TIMOTHY W. COOK (Mass. BBO# 688688)* 131 Steuart St #400 tcook@cooley.com San Francisco, CA 94105 FRANCISCO M. UNGER (Mass. BBO# Telephone: (415) 814-7631 698807)* funger@cooley.com JUDAH LAKIN (SBN 307740) COOLEY LLP judah@lakinwille.com 500 Boylston Street AMALIA WILLE (SBN 293342) Boston, MA 02116 amalia@lakinwille.com Telephone: (617) 937-2300 LAKIN & WILLE LLP Facsimile: (617) 937-2400 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 420 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 379-9216 Facsimile: (510) 379-9219 JORDAN WELLS (SBN 326491) jwells@aclusocal.org STEPHANIE PADILLA (SBN 321568) spadilla@aclusocal.org AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 1313 West Eighth Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 977-9500 Facsimile: (213) 977-5297

Attorneys for Petitioners-Plaintiffs *Admitted Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to the Court’s Order granting the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 35), the Court has directed that members of the provisionally certified class submit individual applications for release from immigration detention on bail and that Defendants respond to such applications. In order to properly consider each application, the Court is requiring the applicant to submit information that includes sensitive and highly personal information and Defendants may also submit such information in response. Such sensitive information includes (1) particularly sensitive personal medical information;(2) the address and telephone number(s) of persons who are proposed as custodians of an applicant in the event of the applicant’s release; (3) juvenile criminal information; and (4) other personally identifiable information as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) of the applicant and of third parties. As to this information, the Court finds that there is good cause to protect the information from being released to the public to protect the applicants from “annoyance, embarrassment [or] oppression ….” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1); Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Moreover, the Court finds that it is in the interests of efficiency and conservation of the resources of the parties and the Court to permit Plaintiffs and Defendants to file these applications and responses under seal without the necessity of filing an administrative motion pursuant to Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1) to accompany each such application. [PROPOSED] ORDER Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs may file bail applications on behalf of individual class members under seal to protect from public disclosure the material described in the following paragraph of this Order, without the necessity of filing an individualized motion to seal pursuant to Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) in support of each bail application. 2. Defendants may file responses to bail applications of individual class members under seal to protect from public disclosure the material described in the following paragraph of this Order, without the necessity of filing an individualized motion to seal pursuant to Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) in support of each bail application. 3. The following categories of information are sealable material within the meaning of Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A): a. Any particularly sensitive medical information concerning the applicant; b. The addresses and telephone numbers of persons who are proposed as custodians of an applicant in the event of the applicant’s release; c. Juvenile criminal information; and d. Other personally identifiable information as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) of the applicant and of third parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. . Dated this 7thday of May 2020 Ln VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER RE BAIL APPLICATIONS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings (Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)