Zentner v. American Federation Of Musicians Of The United States And Canada

Second Circuit

Zentner v. American Federation Of Musicians Of The United States And Canada

343 F.2d 758, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5994

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 1965

Docket29539

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 F.2d 758 (Zentner v. American Federation Of Musicians Of The United States And Canada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zentner v. American Federation Of Musicians Of The United States And Canada, 343 F.2d 758, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5994 (2d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

343 F.2d 758

Si ZENTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA and Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, affiliated with American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 424.

Docket 29539.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1965.

Decided April 6, 1965.

Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, New York City (Emanuel Dannett, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

When the case was before Judge Weinfeld plaintiff challenged the Federation's "work dues equivalents" as violating § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended in 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 186, and § 101(a) (3), of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a) (3). In this court the latter ground of attack was not pressed. The challenge under § 302 is baseless, for reasons well expressed in the opinion of Judge Weinfeld, reported at 237 F.Supp. 457, denying the application for preliminary injunctive relief.

We affirm the order below, and since it is obvious that there is no merit in plaintiff's claims, we direct that the court below dismiss the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

343 F.2d 758

Si ZENTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA and Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, affiliated with American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 424.

Docket 29539.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1965.

Decided April 6, 1965.

Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, New York City (Emanuel Dannett, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

When the case was before Judge Weinfeld plaintiff challenged the Federation's "work dues equivalents" as violating § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended in 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 186, and § 101(a) (3), of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a) (3). In this court the latter ground of attack was not pressed. The challenge under § 302 is baseless, for reasons well expressed in the opinion of Judge Weinfeld, reported at 237 F.Supp. 457, denying the application for preliminary injunctive relief.

We affirm the order below, and since it is obvious that there is no merit in plaintiff's claims, we direct that the court below dismiss the complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 F.2d 758, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zentner-v-american-federation-of-musicians-of-the-united-states-and-canada-ca2-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack