Zentmyer's Appeal

3 Pennyp. 224
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County
DecidedMay 22, 1883
DocketNo. 356
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pennyp. 224 (Zentmyer's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zentmyer's Appeal, 3 Pennyp. 224 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

— Per Curiam :

The only question [228]*228here relates to the liability of the appellant to pay attorney’s commissions. He agreed to pay them. The evidence shows he failed to pay the interest on the judgment, although several times requested so to do. The attorney was therefore instructed to collect. He rendered services therein. It was held in Daly, v. Maitland, 7 Norris, 387, that the Court should fix the compensation proper to be paid. In this case, the Court fixed it at two and a half per cent. Under all the evidence, we see no cause for disturbing the conclusion at which the Court arrived. The appellant presents no just cause of complaint with the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Pennyp. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zentmyers-appeal-pactcomplhuntin-1883.