Zenkner v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Washington Territory

Zenkner v. Northern Pacific Railroad

14 P. 596, 3 Wash. Terr. 60, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 52

DecidedJanuary 21, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 14 P. 596 (Zenkner v. Northern Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zenkner v. Northern Pacific Railroad, 14 P. 596, 3 Wash. Terr. 60, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 52 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Greene

delivered the opinion of the court.

[61]*61The principles decisive of the case of Mulkey v. McGrew, 2 Wash. 259, 262, are decisive also of this motion to strike. A mass of paper writing purporting to be a statement of facts under the appeal act of 1883 is here, but it is not certified as required by that act, and there is nothing to assure us that it contains “all the material facts in the case.” It is a superfluity. Appearance would not waive the right to object to it.

The motion to strike it from the cause is granted.

Langford, J., and Turner, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI