ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v. United States

865 F. Supp. 890, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1027, 18 C.I.T. 1027, 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2375, 1994 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 197
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedOctober 21, 1994
DocketCourt No. 87-01-00039, Slip Op. No. 94-170
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 865 F. Supp. 890 (ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v. United States, 865 F. Supp. 890, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1027, 18 C.I.T. 1027, 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2375, 1994 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 197 (cit 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

WATSON, Senior Judge.

Upon consideration of Defendant Interve-nors AOC International’s, Fulet Electronic Industrial Company, Ltd.’s, Sampo Corporation’s, and Tatung Company’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment, and all other pleadings, papers and proceedings herein, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Defendant Interve-nors’ motion be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Commerce Department’s remand determination dated May 5, 1993, as well as the Commerce Department’s prior remand determinations in this case to the extent that they were not subsequently modified by this Court, is AFFIRMED; and it is further

ORDERED, that this Court’s order dated July 29, 1991, 770 F.Supp. 648, is VACATED to the extent that it held that “no assessment rate cap may be applied in liquidating the subject entries unless the importer paid a cash duty for an estimated dumping duty” and it is further

ORDERED, that Commerce shall apply the assessment rate cap to all subject imports entered between publication dates of the Commerce Department’s preliminary affirmative determination of sales at less than fair value and the International Trade Commission’s final affirmative injury determination and it is further

ORDERED, that Final Judgment is entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F. Supp. 890, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1027, 18 C.I.T. 1027, 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2375, 1994 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zenith-electronics-corporation-v-united-states-cit-1994.