Zenie v. Miskend
1 N.E.2d 367, 270 N.Y. 636, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1684
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the affirmative, and second and third questions answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zenie v. Miskend, 1 N.E.2d 367, 270 N.Y. 636, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1684 (N.Y. 1936).
1 N.E.2d 367 (Zenie v. Miskend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Kinetics Corp. v. Marshall, Neil & Pauley, Inc.
521 P.2d 1209 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1974)
American Cyanamid Co. v. Power Conversion, Inc.
71 Misc. 2d 213 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
American Harley Corp. v. Irvin Industries, Inc.
263 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
American Harley Corp. v. Irvin Industries, Inc.
33 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Wolf v. Gold
9 A.D.2d 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
F & F Laboratories, Inc. v. Chocolate Spraying Co.
127 N.E.2d 682 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1955)
L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Falls
292 N.W. 498 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
Zenobia Co. v. American Pistachio Corp.
168 Misc. 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)
Black v. Judelsohn
251 A.D. 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)