Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc.
50 A.2d 895, 135 N.J.L. 205, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 202
Opinion
The judgment under review heroin is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice ('ase in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan. McLean. JJ. 13.
For reversal — ’None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc., 50 A.2d 895, 135 N.J.L. 205, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1947).
50 A.2d 895 (Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nielsen v. Wal-Mart Store 2171
57 A.3d 1121 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Yanhko v. Fane
362 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
Lambe v. Reardon
173 A.2d 520 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Orlik v. DeAlmeida
133 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Mount v. Recka
114 A.2d 289 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Coll v. Bernstein
81 A.2d 389 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)