Zembrod v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Zembrod v. State

25 Tex. 519

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 519 (Zembrod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zembrod v. State, 25 Tex. 519 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Roberts, J.

The Appellant may be guilty of a capital offence as charged. The testimony of the witnesses upon the subject of his insanity, as presented in the record before us, is of a character to induce the belief that it is not a case in which the “ proof is evident or presumption great.” (O. & W. Dig., 14; Carter v. The State, 12 Tex. R., 504; Com. v. Rogers, 7 Metcalf, Shaw C. J. Leading Crim. Cases, B. & H., 1 vol., 87, and notes of English .and American cases.) Therefore it is determined that he is entitled to bail.

Bail allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts, J.

The Appellant may be guilty of a capital offence as charged. The testimony of the witnesses upon the subject of his insanity, as presented in the record before us, is of a character to induce the belief that it is not a case in which the “ proof is evident or presumption great.” (O. & W. Dig., 14; Carter v. The State, 12 Tex. R., 504; Com. v. Rogers, 7 Metcalf, Shaw C. J. Leading Crim. Cases, B. & H., 1 vol., 87, and notes of English .and American cases.) Therefore it is determined that he is entitled to bail.

Bail allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zembrod-v-state-tex-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack