Zeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zeman v. State

238 So. 3d 316

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 7, 2018

DocketNo. 4D17–2995

StatusPublished

This text of 238 So. 3d 316 (Zeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeman v. State, 238 So. 3d 316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in summarily denying his claim of newly discovered evidence without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Nordelo v. State , 93 So.3d 178 (Fla. 2012). We express no opinion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in summarily denying his claim of newly discovered evidence without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Nordelo v. State , 93 So.3d 178 (Fla. 2012). We express no opinion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 So. 3d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack