Zeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zeman v. State

238 So. 3d 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2018·No. No. 4D17–2995·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in summarily denying his claim of newly discovered evidence without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Nordelo v. State , 93 So.3d 178 (Fla. 2012). We express no opinion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in summarily denying his claim of newly discovered evidence without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Nordelo v. State , 93 So.3d 178 (Fla. 2012). We express no opinion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.

Zeman v. State, 238 So. 3d 316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

238 So. 3d 316 (Zeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related