Zeltmacher v. Mullally

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zeltmacher v. Mullally

248 A.D. 766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 766 (Zeltmacher v. Mullally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeltmacher v. Mullally, 248 A.D. 766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellants brought an action to cancel two second mortgages on the ground of usury, and respondent brought an action to foreclose one of the mortgages. The actions were consolidated. Judgment was entered against appellants by default. The appeal is from the order denying their motion to open their default. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellants brought an action to cancel two second mortgages on the ground of usury, and respondent brought an action to foreclose one of the mortgages. The actions were consolidated. Judgment was entered against appellants by default. The appeal is from the order denying their motion to open their default. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeltmacher-v-mullally-nyappdiv-1936.