Zellner Plastering Company v. United States of America, by Its Agent United States Navy

9 F.3d 1556, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37036, 1993 WL 455165
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 1993
Docket92-55575
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 F.3d 1556 (Zellner Plastering Company v. United States of America, by Its Agent United States Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zellner Plastering Company v. United States of America, by Its Agent United States Navy, 9 F.3d 1556, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37036, 1993 WL 455165 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

9 F.3d 1556

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
ZELLNER PLASTERING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, by its agent; United States Navy,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-55575.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993.
Decided Nov. 5, 1993.

Before REINHARDT, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN,* District Judge.

MEMORANDUM**

A contracting officer's alleged negligent approval of a surety bond is not actionable under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Westbay Steel, Inc. v. United States, 970 F.2d 648, 651 (9th Cir.1992); see also Hardaway Co. v. United States Army Corps of Eng'rs, 980 F.2d 1415, 1417-18 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 62 U.S.L.W. 3245 (U.S. Oct. 4, 1993). Zellner's distinction between "no bond," "inadequate bond," and "bad bond" cases is one without a difference. See Westbay, 970 F.2d at 650.

The district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain this action. Id. at 651. Westbay controls the outcome of this case. The district court's order granting the motion to dismiss with prejudice is AFFIRMED.

*

Honorable Frank A. Kaufman, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F.3d 1556, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37036, 1993 WL 455165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zellner-plastering-company-v-united-states-of-america-by-its-agent-united-ca9-1993.