Zeller v. State
46 Ind. 304
Opinion
This was an indictment against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. The only question in the case as presented by counsel is, was the evidence sufficient to justify the verdict of the jury?
The evidence does not clearly connect the defendant with-the sale of the liquor, by showing that he sold it to the minor, directed the sale, or was present assenting to it. The case must be governed by the principle enunciated in Hanson v. The State, 43 Ind. 550.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zeller v. State, 46 Ind. 304 (Ind. 1874).
46 Ind. 304 (Zeller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenbaum v. State
57 N.E. 156 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)
Wilson v. State
46 N.E. 1050 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
State ex rel. Denney v. Leach
46 N.E. 549 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)