Zeller v. Greenebaum

116 N.Y.S. 556
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 7, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, employed as a butcher, sued to recover $13 for one week’s wages. The services were not denied. Defendant claimed that he had discharged plaintiff because he had been told by his cashier that plaintiff had been taking tips from customers and giving away his employer’s goods and that plaintiff had admitted these things. This the plaintiff denied. The trial judge found for defendant.

If the defendant had proved that plaintiff had disposed of goods’ ■equal in amount to the latter’s salary, defendant might have been allowed to offset the value of those goods. This, however, the defendant did not do; the only evidence offered on this head being in regard to one small purchase, amounting to 33 cents, which plaintiff swears was paid for.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zeller v. Greenebaum, 116 N.Y.S. 556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

116 N.Y.S. 556 (Zeller v. Greenebaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.