Zeller v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zeller v. Board of Education

189 A.D.2d 877, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A.D.2d 877 (Zeller v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeller v. Board of Education, 189 A.D.2d 877, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in which the petitioner, inter alia, seeks reinstatement to his position as coach of a girls’ varsity softball team, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated August 15, 1990, as denied their motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This is an appeal from an intermediate order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. No appeal lies as of right from that order, nor has permission for the taking of an appeal been sought or granted. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Wallace v Wyandanch Union Free School Dist., 58 AD2d 813; Cirasole v Simins, 48 AD2d 795; Hawley v Town of Aurora, 41 AD2d 588). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in which the petitioner, inter alia, seeks reinstatement to his position as coach of a girls’ varsity softball team, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated August 15, 1990, as denied their motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This is an appeal from an intermediate order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. No appeal lies as of right from that order, nor has permission for the taking of an appeal been sought or granted. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Wallace v Wyandanch Union Free School Dist., 58 AD2d 813; Cirasole v Simins, 48 AD2d 795; Hawley v Town of Aurora, 41 AD2d 588). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 877, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeller-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack