Zell v. Cobb
This text of 585 So. 2d 505 (Zell v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gerard Zell appeals a cost judgment entered against him. He contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred insofar as it awarded costs for two demonstrative exhibits which were not used at trial. See Loftin v. Anderson, 66 So.2d 470, 472-73 (Fla.1953). We reverse and remand for reduction of the award accordingly. We are not persuaded that the trial court abused its discretion with regard to the remainder of the items disputed by Zell.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 So. 2d 505, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9543, 1991 WL 181506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zell-v-cobb-fladistctapp-1991.