Zell v. Cobb

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zell v. Cobb

585 So. 2d 505, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9543, 1991 WL 181506

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zell v. Cobb. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 806 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1991·No. No. 90-2594·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gerard Zell appeals a cost judgment entered against him. He contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred insofar as it awarded costs for two demonstrative exhibits which were not used at trial. See Loftin v. Anderson, 66 So.2d 470, 472-73 (Fla.1953). We reverse and remand for reduction of the award accordingly. We are not persuaded that the trial court abused its discretion with regard to the remainder of the items disputed by Zell.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gerard Zell appeals a cost judgment entered against him. He contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred insofar as it awarded costs for two demonstrative exhibits which were not used at trial. See Loftin v. Anderson, 66 So.2d 470, 472-73 (Fla.1953). We reverse and remand for reduction of the award accordingly. We are not persuaded that the trial court abused its discretion with regard to the remainder of the items disputed by Zell.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Zell v. Cobb, 585 So. 2d 505, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9543, 1991 WL 181506 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

585 So. 2d 505 (Zell v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related