Zelinsky v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zelinsky v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.

272 A.D.2d 926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 926 (Zelinsky v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zelinsky v. Green Bus Lines, Inc., 272 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant’s truck was parked alongside a curb. An opening on the side of the truck was exposed to traffic on the roadway. According to the evidence, appellant was either standing on the roadway and reaching into the truck through the side opening, or was backing out from the inside of his truck. He was injured by respondents’ bus as it was passing the truck. Judgment, entered in favor of respondents after a trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. If there was error in the admission in evidence of the decree of divorce, it did not affect a substantial right of appellant. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant’s truck was parked alongside a curb. An opening on the side of the truck was exposed to traffic on the roadway. According to the evidence, appellant was either standing on the roadway and reaching into the truck through the side opening, or was backing out from the inside of his truck. He was injured by respondents’ bus as it was passing the truck. Judgment, entered in favor of respondents after a trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. If there was error in the admission in evidence of the decree of divorce, it did not affect a substantial right of appellant. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zelinsky-v-green-bus-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1947.