Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

359 So. 2d 518, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1978

DocketNos. 77-603, 77-776

StatusPublished

This text of 359 So. 2d 518 (Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp., 359 So. 2d 518, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, appellants urge, among other things, that the trial court improperly charged the jury and that the jury verdict was not supported by the evidence.

Although the standard jury instructions were not used, the trial judge’s own jury instructions fairly and adequately covered all issues and instructed the jury as to its duties in the trial. We find no error in this regard.

The evidence in the record supports the jury verdict. See Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Espinosa, 344 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Appellants’ other arguments are deemed without merit. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI