Zelinger v. Conley
317 P.2d 894, 136 Colo. 387, 1957 Colo. LEXIS 260
This text of 317 P.2d 894 (Zelinger v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zelinger v. Conley, 317 P.2d 894, 136 Colo. 387, 1957 Colo. LEXIS 260 (Colo. 1957).
Opinion
Mr. Justice Frantz did not participate.
Mr. Chief Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Holland and Mr. Justice Sutton are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Mr. Justice Knauss, Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Day are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.
The court being equally divided, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by operation of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
317 P.2d 894, 136 Colo. 387, 1957 Colo. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zelinger-v-conley-colo-1957.