Zeliff v. Whritenour

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Zeliff v. Whritenour

54 A. 560, 69 N.J.L. 224, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 189

DecidedFebruary 24, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A. 560 (Zeliff v. Whritenour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeliff v. Whritenour, 54 A. 560, 69 N.J.L. 224, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 189 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By the second section of a supplement to the “Act to incorporate the chosen freeholders in the respective counties of this state,” approved March 7th, 1901 (Pamph. L., p. 49), any vacancy existing in the office of chosen freeholders in any township, by reason of resignation, removal, death or any other' cause, may be filled for the unexpired term by the township committee. It appears from the information in this case that the respondent was duly elected a chosen freeholder of the county of Passaic from the township of Manchester, and that, while occupying this office, the township committee, after formally declaring his office vacant upon the ground that he had removed out of the state, appointed the relator to fill the alleged vacancy for the unexpired term. The defendant, in his plea, denies that his office ever became vacant, and asserts that ever since his election he has continued to be, and still is, a resident of the township of Manchester.

This plea contains a complete answer to the information. The demurrer admits the facts set out in it to be true. The power of the township committee to appoint a member of the board of freeholders for this township depends upon the existence of the conditions prescribed in the statute. Their declaration that one of the conditions exist, the declaration being contrary to the fact, affords no ground for action on their part, and such action is a nullity.

The defendant .is entitled to judgment on the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By the second section of a supplement to the “Act to incorporate the chosen freeholders in the respective counties of this state,” approved March 7th, 1901 (Pamph. L., p. 49), any vacancy existing in the office of chosen freeholders in any township, by reason of resignation, removal, death or any other' cause, may be filled for the unexpired term by the township committee. It appears from the information in this case that the respondent was duly elected a chosen freeholder of the county of Passaic from the township of Manchester, and that, while occupying this office, the township committee, after formally declaring his office vacant upon the ground that he had removed out of the state, appointed the relator to fill the alleged vacancy for the unexpired term. The defendant, in his plea, denies that his office ever became vacant, and asserts that ever since his election he has continued to be, and still is, a resident of the township of Manchester.

This plea contains a complete answer to the information. The demurrer admits the facts set out in it to be true. The power of the township committee to appoint a member of the board of freeholders for this township depends upon the existence of the conditions prescribed in the statute. Their declaration that one of the conditions exist, the declaration being contrary to the fact, affords no ground for action on their part, and such action is a nullity.

The defendant .is entitled to judgment on the demurrer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A. 560, 69 N.J.L. 224, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeliff-v-whritenour-nj-1903.